FW Lawvere / Angus MacIntyre / John L Bell / Colin McLarty / Pierre Cartier Rencontres, Fougeres 2005
← All recordings

Recorded at Rencontres, Fougeres (2005), featuring FW Lawvere, Angus MacIntyre, John L Bell, Colin McLarty, Pierre Cartier. From the Michael Wright Collection, held by the Archive Trust for Research in Mathematical Sciences & Philosophy.

Identifier
mw0000845-cc-b_p
Format
Audio recording
Collection
Michael Wright Collection
Repository
Archive Trust for Research in Mathematical Sciences & Philosophy
Rights
Made available for personal scholarly use. Rights in recordings are generally held by the speakers or their estates. If you believe this recording infringes your rights, please contact [email protected].
Transcript
Read the automatically generated transcript

This transcript was generated by speech-recognition software from an archival recording and has not been hand-corrected. It will contain recognition errors — particularly for proper names and technical terminology — so please verify against the audio before quoting. Timestamps play the recording from that moment.

0:00 The point is, there were some things to do with, you know, abstracting all of this stuff, which we could see in synthetic mathematics in high school, and he said, this is not really a move to promote science, to provide a foundation to idealism. Yes, Lenin, Lenin doesn't even mention, you know, the principle of reason, although I must say, he did a very informative presentation. No, no, no. But, you know, in fact, in fact, if all he's doing, he's not, he's conspicuous, he doesn't, he doesn't, he doesn't, he doesn't, he doesn't, he doesn't, he doesn't, he doesn't, he doesn't, he doesn't, he doesn't, he doesn't, he doesn't, he doesn't, he doesn't, he doesn't, he doesn't, he doesn't, he doesn't, he doesn't, Thank you for watching!

2:30 Yeah, they're very bad. But you know, oddly enough, Russell, they really are very interesting people. Yes, at least on the notion of what it meant to be an attention. He actually took some of his food. He then got off of it. It's quite remarkable. Well, in general, he's fresh. Well, you know, you have to take Russell. No, but actually, he's quite useful in really trying to do it in some sort of deriving. He's already left it. But he does take it. And so he has to take these notions seriously. To take it. I don't think so. Not in the principles of mathematics, because he's not talking about it. Well, he may have read the mathematical passages.

5:00 Yes, and he does give some interesting answers. But Bradley claims to be an expert. If that's not it, it's just a little...

7:30 Let's cut some of the light pollution.