Saving the truth schema from paradox (last part) / discussion / lunch conversations: FW Lawvere & S Awodey

0:00 Thank you very much for your attention and I hope to see you again soon. Let me talk to Sean again. I heard a continuing story. I need to talk to him about a lot of questions. Thank you for your attention. Thank you for watching. You have some of your pupils working on their own jobs, don't you? Yes, we are part of the science team.

2:30 Amazing. You just told me about it. It's incredible. Look what I've been seeing the others get covered in. They've been contained in the buzzers. It's kind of an express way to show the benefits of it in case you want to do it. There's a whole series of things they should have done that they didn't do. Well, in a sense, that's what happened. How did they actually become there? Well, there's a whole introduction to it as well. I plan to go there and buy it. It's an amazing show that's around the corner, for all of you who have come on up to go here, on the platform, I'm sorry, just off the platform, which specialises, no, in fact, this is one of the places where I was going to speak to you on the platform. Wonderful. I mean, these wonderful scientists and reprints, reprints of all these great historical scientists, from Galileo, from De Waal. That's the publisher that sent you down. I'm not sure, I'm not sure if it's the same arm, but they have a shot and it's, as you look up the law of the pantheon, just before the class, the last pantheon was right before the class of the pantheon, so a couple of pantheons before the law of the pantheon, they have a shot just before the law of the pantheon, and I know that there's still quite a lot of support for the law of the pantheon. The great place to live with files, and it's cheap too. But they do this wonderful work, they have all of the characters, they're actually kind of close to the scale of the original trailer, and they have... If sparks aren't the big text from the 17th century up to around 1930, then it's the whole of the way.

5:00 It's in the scholarly edition. The whole of the way there definitely exists. Well, no, no, I was just going to say, of course, I'm realizing since I said that nobody's ever produced the complete edition. But certainly if my teacher approves, then I'll play the big role on the segment. Yes, indeed. Well, let us say everything that was published in the French Monroy's work during the 18th and 19th centuries was a reproduction. I should not have said Monroy, it was certainly Monroy. There's certainly the grounds that all those people had a kind of a deep environment and a lovely reproduction of the mechanical activity. Well, that was the latest one from France, it's a Nautilus. The first cases were under the 50s and 60s. Compare that with the sort of practice of Louis Charles. Which Canadian is he? Leo Kauri. Leo Kauri. Yeah, Leo Kauri. Thank you for your attention. I hope you enjoyed this video, and if you did, please leave a like and subscribe to my channel, and I'll see you in the next one. Let's go here and hear this strange guy talk to you about... Anyway...

7:30 Yes, I guess you have to remember to reverse the... But if it says here I have to reverse, then it's on the other side and obviously it's on this side. You have to perform a few symmetrizations or anti-symmetrizations. I have trouble reading things in the mirror. Thank you. So, before I realized that it's from the other side of the North? Yes, yes, exactly. I know he has questions. Yeah, I mean, he said he gave that little kind of tirade in the beginning about what's wrong with... Yeah, yeah, it was so wrong. And then it wasn't clear why. I mean, it was like, well, you don't like how much the space is, or what's your problem? Well, this was the reason. This is the reason. But he never came back to it and explained why. There is no T. There is no T if that's your notion of space. If your notion of space is a conventional one, there's no such T. No, that's right. So if you want to have a T like that, you've got to slam the conventional notion of space into it. And you've got to base everything on this notion of figures. You've got to base everything on this notion of figures. This is the thing, he thinks this is what Voltaire's problem is, and then it all comes to the development of quantum vector spaces, which has been completely the wrong way for geology to go, because there's not been so many ideas of geometry together. But the fact is that, actually, the way that things fit together, he actually showed that, and it's been happening for nearly 400 years.

10:00 He's getting good at this. He's getting good at this. He's getting, he's getting good at this. He's never been looking at physics. He's never been a graduate student, but he's getting a lot better. Some of this is basically a good practice. Yes. But this one was much better. Because there hasn't been much more on this previous point about looking at the evidence, and you have these journals, and how it would be to actually be able to think of the exact parameters of the physics, and think of all the qualities of science, you know, and the meaning of them. And so on and so forth. They got something out of it. Yeah, whereas normally they get a lot of profit out of it. So as I think John Dickens, in terms of exposition-ship, he's getting a lot better. It's the first time I've ever heard him talk, so I came out a short time. I wonder if he hates that he was late enough.

12:30 And of course, one of the reasons he's particularly bad on math is because he's not good at picturing math concepts. There are a lot of categories of the language, and I'm wondering about that. I don't know that stuff, but do you think especially in this country, which we're ashamed of, and of course, the Hindi, you only need one, the Hindi, they're not even from Georgia, they're not even from the UK, these people think they're going to do that. Oh, yeah, yeah, I guess I have. No, these are physicists, not mathematicians. You're willing to be a little bit sloppy, that's a hurt. But there is the fundamental part of that, which is what he does things for me, I mean, to be in the field, I mean, that's the right guy, but I think the whole thing is a couple of years ago, a couple of years ago, and he, of course, had a very, very, but he was noticed by the French.