[Unidentified lecture, 1976]
From the Michael Wright Collection, held by the Archive Trust for Research in Mathematical Sciences & Philosophy.
- Identifier
mw0000959-cc-b_p- Format
- Audio recording
- Collection
- Michael Wright Collection
- Repository
- Archive Trust for Research in Mathematical Sciences & Philosophy
- Rights
- Made available for personal scholarly use. Rights in recordings are generally held by the speakers or their estates. If you believe this recording infringes your rights, please contact [email protected].
Read the automatically generated transcript
This transcript was generated by speech-recognition software from an archival recording and has not been hand-corrected. It will contain recognition errors — particularly for proper names and technical terminology — so please verify against the audio before quoting. Timestamps play the recording from that moment.
0:00 Well, your statement, which I'm very impressed with.
7:30 You take, say, are you ready to discuss? No, I'm not. I'm not. You take some microscopic large distance, and that might be one thing. You take into account this thing has geometry. And in particular... They try by some process of sophisticated, by no means certain.
10:00 And so, I mean, different observers might actually disagree about where plastic doesn't work,
15:00 but they get it. Good one. They don't measure the same system at the same time according to their own local evidence, according to the historical evidence they carry with them. We introduce the past by historical evidence. I believe that I'm saying it might be complicated,
17:30 but who can read it? Because in everyday sense it's such that I don't identify anything or something, just meaning something to probably act to as if it were there in some way. Giving an objective view to this is inherently fuzzy. This is one of the things as well, and those are the two tasks that you can't measure.
Transcript not yet available for this recording.