Dennis Sciama Oxford 1974
← All recordings

Recorded at Oxford (1974), featuring Dennis Sciama. From the Michael Wright Collection, held by the Archive Trust for Research in Mathematical Sciences & Philosophy.

Identifier
mw0000916-cc-b_p
Format
Audio recording
Collection
Michael Wright Collection
Repository
Archive Trust for Research in Mathematical Sciences & Philosophy
Rights
Made available for personal scholarly use. Rights in recordings are generally held by the speakers or their estates. If you believe this recording infringes your rights, please contact [email protected].
Transcript
Read the automatically generated transcript

This transcript was generated by speech-recognition software from an archival recording and has not been hand-corrected. It will contain recognition errors — particularly for proper names and technical terminology — so please verify against the audio before quoting. Timestamps play the recording from that moment.

27:30 We don't know. It refers to our own migrations. Any effect on the way to a mathematical problem are new in this picture.

30:00 I think once you talk about quantized mathematics, then you do require some additional aspects. I was wondering if there is a question. Not quite. Yeah. It's a question to talk about. You guys said to get out at the end of the week and finish this. That's cool. We'll do that. We better manage that. Well, you have two theories. It tells you that you have the universe theory, but that theory is not the theory of quantum mathematics. But can I make this to be true? Which, in fact, is going to be one of my answers to the question ahead. The problem here is how to characterize what's involved. I'd like to have a measure of the intensity of that. What is not a function is the number of photons in the band, assuming that once the microwave matrix was itself made, no more of this incredible process of any importance would be further enough. Then, as the universe expands, the number of photons and the number of baryons in any volume would be...

32:30 And that number is an order of 10 to the 8th, in the same three degree background, and the kind of density that I'm speaking of is an uncertainty factor. This number is an order of 10 to the 8th. So the problem is, why should the intensity of the photons vary on every photon? I'm not just sneaking into your seminar here. This is relevant because one of the answers that has been given to this question is precisely a complex pair creation where the gravity field is kept classical and the magnetic field is volatile. It might be just the entropy, but that's the right answer, but of course it might be, if it is the right answer, then again I'm going to commit back to telling you there was this quantum which is still important today, and you've got to, of course, consider it. And I appreciate some of the energy conditions are violated by the virtual, but once the matter becomes real, the energy conditions are set. Maybe we can really apply this to reality. For example, I just allowed a momentum to be multiplied by the momentum of gravity and the other one didn't know what he really was getting at. The one thing is dead, the weak energy is conditioned energy. Food is there to prop it up. Of course, it's purely energy. The energy is one negative to the world, to the field, but that's for the weak energy. The theory of physics is weak. There are theories of physics that are weak. How do you compute the contribution? How do you compute that expectation?

35:00 There will be circumstances if the situation is set on the horizon. Thank you for your attention.

37:30 Oh, well, I may as well... Streeter, here we are. Sorry. It's quantum theory. Uh, analysis. Committee. Mandate four. Now, there are two... Yes, there are two procedures. We either have a phrasal of things, which would be relatively easy, or we try to do the full project, in which case, a draft, which I am now writing... I think that's better really, because that will mean that if we get something like Cronenberg, it would be a little more detailed, it might have to be put around us on the table. Rosemary thinks actually that if it's an item on the agenda, And if you get it to her by about Thursday, if it's already time, they can then get to you and ask you. So, do you hope to do this? Yeah. We'll avoid this. The point is, it's liable to heaven. We've been having a concert. We are leaving on September 2, 2020, so that will be back for France, and the move of the version of the timetable is important because of the fact that it's going to be signed quickly and everything is going to be in place. Very rarely, sooner than ever, does this get leaked all around the faculty of the faculty of the faculty of the faculty of the faculty of the faculty of the faculty.

40:00 Yes, this will come clear, I think, tomorrow morning if I manage to get this into Amherst tomorrow morning. Ready to fight for freedom. And that's not what we're going to do. But it's rather a piece to write, I think. Well, it's part of what I've left with rather a lot to do. Thank you for your attention. Yes, we're out of time. If you want to die, or if you want to live, it's up to you, it's up to you, it's up to you, it's up to you, it's up to you.

42:30 Thank you very much for your attention and I look forward to seeing you again soon. We've all gone that way, we've all been there for a bit. The congregation decided that we ought to love these people. Yes, they're much in love with us. Sure. And also possibly getting ourselves into rather difficult situations. Yes, I mean, there's not any sort of design to work with things like that, but I've got a set of standards that I know of, but I think they're important, one for one. I think that's terribly important because it's not what you think it is. Thank you.