Constants in Hamiltonian Formalism
Recorded at conversation (2008), featuring Michael Wright, Basil J Hiley. From the Michael Wright Collection, held by the Archive Trust for Research in Mathematical Sciences & Philosophy.
- Identifier
mw0000346-cc-a_p- Format
- Audio recording
- Collection
- Michael Wright Collection
- Repository
- Archive Trust for Research in Mathematical Sciences & Philosophy
- Rights
- Made available for personal scholarly use. Rights in recordings are generally held by the speakers or their estates. If you believe this recording infringes your rights, please contact [email protected].
Read the automatically generated transcript
This transcript was generated by speech-recognition software from an archival recording and has not been hand-corrected. It will contain recognition errors — particularly for proper names and technical terminology — so please verify against the audio before quoting. Timestamps play the recording from that moment.
0:00 Well, I think we should definitely try and arrange a meeting with Colin and Bill and I'm going to send that to you. I mean, I've got it. Does the library not take... No, no, I know you didn't. You have to hate me because you thought it was cynical. Don't look down. I insist that that's not a... That's okay with you. Oh, okay. Okay. No, no, no. I'd forgotten you had a phone in the kitchen. No problem.
20:00 I've heard many people use time, he's very good at, you know, what do you mind, he's just going, anyway, I'm quite happy to ask him, I mean, that's the way it is here, well, the best way of doing that is actually if he can't, oh yeah, yeah, yeah, I mean, George is going to ask him, George is going to ask him, oh, fine, that's fine, he may get it, the idea of drama is different.
22:30 I was told that firmly by Maurice. Yeah, Maurice, I think that's why. He asked me... His wife wants to go on a holiday. She has a great... She's delighted to go. And he wanted to know... Well, nothing... Where I've been.
25:00 There's a bloody line about, you know, women in front of people. Tell me about it. Tell me about it. There's a couple of them, all these women and, you know... Was that what that e-mail was about?
27:30 I can't remember. You said to me... No, listen, it was on the phone. There was an email that came through which I couldn't make head or tail on. Oh, well, maybe you did. She'd sent, yeah, David, you know where David, he'd got a meeting in Parker on the weekend. Yeah, but he's been, he's actually got some, he wanted me to get, if I was in, you know, when we were in Washington together, he sort of totally ignored me on occasion. I would, I only met him a couple of times, but my impression of him is arrogant. Arrogant bastards I've ever met. Absolutely incredible. I could never, quite honestly, as I said, nothing like it. Never shown.
30:00 How do you do this all inside the real bundle?
52:30 This is an interesting point. You can obviously for the Schrodinger. An interesting point. The momentum of the I-H-R-E-W. Which means you are in the problem.
55:00 I've got a symplectic structure lying there. Bally and this, I've also done a model. What I'm doing there, because of your accuracy, Alan, we've got eight parameters in there. I've got the advantage where I'm going from three pluses in my metric. I can skip it to a little aspect, but not the big drop when I change the metric. Because now I've got, you know, I always have the momentum and the energy of two. When you get on to the one, you do have a, you have a mini-relevance group. The point is to try and see what happens with that couple of them. When you say mini-relevance group, what do you mean? It's just one one-dimensional, one-dimensional lapse, one space-dimensional lapse. So it's one time in two spaces. Now, I'm always a believer in going to the simplest things, which you can get away with, which has got the essential structure in there, and then you can blow it up. There is no problem. Not only do you get the gradient of the potential, you've also got another term, which is what I've been looking at at the moment is using super-Hamiltonian.
57:30 I was going to say, this surely must connect, Victor. Yes, it's to do with super-Hamiltonian. And the super-Hamiltonian puts a constraint on the energy. And in that super-Hamiltonian, I can see the quantum potential of physics. You bet I can. That's the next step. I already wrote a paper on the Dirac theory and the Witten and Morales. Oh yes, I know, I know you did. Yeah, I know, well, yeah. Well, yes, yes, yes. Yes, yes, yes. Yes, yes, yes. Yes, yes, yes. Yes, yes, yes. Yes, yes, yes. Yes, yes, yes.
1:00:00 You're going to show it. Yeah, right. That's pretty natural. What you can do is a clip of algebra, particularly with the power of 3, 0, 1, 2. So you can immediately replace wherever you see design you can put. He's going. He is always. I'm not saying I've got rid of it. No, no, no, no, no. I'm trying to explore how far you can get. The idea is that the other generator is commutes with everything in his arm, his arm, so you don't need it there, it's in the palm, it's a complex number, but it commutes with all the elements you use in the idea, but it commutes with all the human elements, and all the ideals can be represented. Ideals are really generating everything. But if I say, if only one thing ever survived from, you know, from the work of Einstein.
1:02:30 I've compiled all that, but I don't know what to do with it. Someone dropped my memory. If you don't have a memory, then I don't know what to do with it. That would be the first thing to go, right? No, I won't. Oh, yeah, yeah. No other better answers. No other better answers. Excuse me. Excuse me, I have to leave. Give me a break. I will be here. I'll give you a break. I think that's the right answer. Yeah, I'm ready. The real answer is that they're right. It's moving just right. Someone's telling me, about five or six years ago, someone, saying that when you turn, when you put a neuron in, instead of the atom, the half-life of the neuron, the real life, of the neuron in that, and that moves just moving.
1:05:00 You see, the argument was that there's very much to be wrong, and of course, it's real life, and it's true to be real life. And you work out the ground space, and then you use what you propose in a current, you know, the boundary of a current, calculate that, and it's just the right value in order to explain and solve. Do that if I get into trouble. In this case, I don't have to do it. Now I'm going to do it in a different way. I mean, I'm trying to get both calendars and lots of paper on it. Well, I don't know of one. I mean, I thought for such an obvious answer that it was boring. That's pretty much the book. But it's not complete. I'm trying to complete it now. Remember I tried doing it the other day. Essential years, and you looked at me and said, from now. That's what I'm working on. And what I'm doing is trying to get to the quantum potential in question. And I need an energy. I need it where there's an energy constraint. And I'm just trying... I mean, I've got it here, but I'm just trying to make it a hundred percent.
1:07:30 I've certainly seen it. Sorry, you're going to pass me a question. Thank you very much for your time, and I hope to see you again in the future. No, it's just a study of MIT. Yeah, but on the other hand, I think I'm going to keep an eye on it to make sure they don't spell a story that we were all told. Well, in fact, that's the other thing which is probably worth mentioning. That's what I'm worried about. In case it's done. That's us. Well, exactly. Or, of course, may be used against you because it has not been taken down in life exactly, so, you know, it's not a back-up scheme, really.
1:10:00 I was just reminding myself of Harold's paper about contention. He is, he is good. And there's no question at all. These ideas about stability, for instance. So, I'll conclude then, then, your point. Oh, all right. I think the point is, you know, I need some good physicists around here. Particularly, how would they suppose about, you know, whether... Yeah, carry on about that, because it's very interesting. No, because what is that... You were just halfway through telling me about the, well, basically about you need the, whether you really need the, well, how you can recover the... You need that, and I'll tell you, to strengthen the energy. Yeah, yeah. And not, in a much better way of looking at the quantum potential I was telling you, which is to get, key terms give you a graph.
1:12:30 I'm not ready yet. No, no. You've got a conservation equation for a space.
1:15:00 A couple of equations from the active commutators. Four equations. And in fact, two of them are itemorphic equations. You've only got three different equations. They all come out, and that's all you can know. You get the Schrodinger equation, it's the left ideal. What was the point we were just on when the phone rang? That the way in which this all stays in the... You can't put them in the ordinary, the real imaginary split, but you can get the means of the idea, but you can't get everything into the library, which in fact of course you can, way back in the, in that paper on the spinner, you could order it, it was the first one of your paper I read, I don't know if that's what it is, but I think this is, this is putting the meat on the table. You know, I always wanted to understand more about what was going on there, particularly the unfoldings of the unfolding and unfoldings.
1:17:30 Well, like that, you know how old it is. But he's got some claims in here, you see, which I've actually got a picture of. Yeah, certainly. Yeah, and I've been putting around.
1:20:00 Yeah, I drove him into it when he was here. I read his article. It was going after a baby that was born. It doesn't agree with what I'm saying. I was just going on my recollection. My recollection was hearsay when I was in the meeting with him. You get things in there. Thank you for watching.
Transcript not yet available for this recording.