La fibre intuitive: vers une mathematique de l'evenement

0:00 Thank you very much. We hope to have at least 2.5 million students at the University of Lisbon. We hope to have at least 2.5 million students at the University of Lisbon. And finally, the third term, which is very important, is the right of the three terms, the four terms and the one-fourth term. So this is, Pauline had already done a research on the genesis of the G.O.T.U. in particular on the importance of momentum. And this is an attack on Penrose. It is a very important component of the theory of quantum mechanics. And so I think the book will mark the stage of the lecture, so I hope to hold a conference in Strel, and I hope to be there, and I hope to be able to talk to you.

2:30 And there is a French tradition of this subject, which I will present to you in the future, in the next slides. So that's it, that's what we have in mind. And then we go back to the point where we can work a little bit more on the state of the state, on the expectations that we have now, philosophically speaking, on the dangers of mathematics. So that's it. I would like to introduce you to the subject of the mathematical form of the event. I have just mentioned that in the scientific-logical literature of the world, in particular in what he calls the atomic logic, which is based on certain notions of mathematics, But the only thing that interests me from a mathematical point of view, and the logic of geometry, is the development of naturalness. I apologize to the mathematicians, but our first objective will be to present to you the basic mathematical notions, in order to be able to develop the second of the two examples that I hope to share with you.

5:00 I do not have any mathematical knowledge, but This will be a plus. The three main aspects of the coreclusion of Hilbert, which is the plane or space part. However, the subject of the Heliopolis formula should be forgotten, according to which a Hilbert would be, I say, a part without borders, because nothing would separate the outside from the inside. What is true, however, is that a Hilbert coincides with its inside and that, in this way, it does not meet its border. Well, it would be a good thing to have heard that once a category is made up of frets and that it makes up the categories of the frets in particular in the estimators, well, that would be a good thing. Well, there will be a lot of I apologize in advance, so everyone will have to make their own film during the exposition, but I would like to say that the first part of what I am going to say is referenced in the separations and the processes that I have made. I don't know if this will be published. The second objective of this lecture is to try to immerse the idea of value in a perspective that is not necessarily yours,

7:30 since where the events signify mathematics, they are identified with the same thing. We try to interrogate mathematical theories first, how they can help us to understand and listen to them at this level, as well as to their universality and their relationship to the universe. I have a big online discussion program for the conference of the new school, so I will start talking about it after the lecture, if it's a good idea, if you like it. We have to choose mentally to be together, everyone has his own choice for himself. The question for this assertion is the exact one, to your answer, either yes or no. So far, it's quite simple, it's even a truth of ordinary ideology. The basic logic is equivalent to the values ​​of the truth to which it refers, consisting of the simplest of what is called a general rule, that is to say, the concept of being, of being, of being, of being, of being, of being, of being, of being, of being, of being, of being, of being, of being, of being, of being, of being. So I vote for the eternal re-establishment of the teaching of the notion of discrimination between the true and the false.

10:00 When this separation is born between the true and the false, the linear system unfolds in the definition of the basic population. If we represent the assembly that is present here by a set of three main themes, each element will therefore represent one of us. All of these are represented by a sub-assembly of the main themes, a sub-assembly of P, phase, preposition, predicate, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, p, However, the complementary of truth and false is the addition of the elements of the tantalum for which the line 1 is false. The initial binary logic frame is thus defined in a lower BN structure, since the contradiction of truth and false is now translated into the complementarity of the whole group of those for whom this line was true and the whole of those for whom it was false. The domain of the operator is, however, not necessarily true. All of those who have studied so much the first time and so much the second time will have the intersection of the two fields and the same operator. So, after the initialization, we now take the binary semantic, the basic logic, but noting that the first phase does not designate precise propositions, since it depends on the parameter, namely the person who makes it in question, that is, you. To transform such a phase into a real proposition, we must quantify the barrier in question, as we said before, In other words, if we specify who is who, the variability that affects the considered sentence does not concern the values ​​of the subject as such, but rather the result of the imprecision of this sentence, to which it would then be indicated to repeat by imprecision of the sentence.

12:30 This is not at all a way of imprecision of the sentence. However, even at this very elementary stage, there is already a lot of interpretation, which consists of bringing the semantic variability of the first part of the sentence closer. And on the values of truth itself by which we propose to evaluate the path of physics. This comes back to pass from an aggregate containing two values of truth to another that contains them, that is to say as many values of truth as the sub-assembly of our topic. From this point of view, the sub-assembly of our topic no longer simply designates the whole of the people for whom it is true that we have chosen the number 7, but rather the degree of truth of our topic. In what measure is this sentence true? It is true in the measure indicated by the sum of the great number of people, which means that they will note the value of the truth. Thus, in this interpretation, the 2D truth of a proposition represents the unknown variation that has returned this conclusion. There are two extreme cases, the one of the person in question, in this case, in Périton. Key terms may include, for example, quantum mechanics, geometry, algebra, mathematics, quantum physics, and so on. Key terms may include, for example, quantum mechanics, geometry, algebra, mathematics, and so on. Key terms may include, for example, quantum mechanics, geometry, mathematics, and so on. Key terms may include, for example, quantum mechanics, geometry, mathematics, and so on. Key terms may include, for example, quantum mechanics, geometry, mathematics, and so on. Key terms may include, for example, quantum mechanics, geometry, mathematics, and so on. Key terms may include, for example, quantum mechanics, geometry, mathematics, and so on.

15:00 Key terms may include, for example, quantum mechanics, geometry, mathematics, and so on. Key terms may include, for example, quantum mechanics, geometry, mathematics, and so on. Key terms may include, for example, quantum mechanics, geometry, mathematics, and so on. On the other hand, the phase is absolutely classic, the conjunction of mathematics and mathematics in the same way. Classic is the expression in which the degree of truth is taken in intervals that are entirely different from each other. It seems to me, partially, to be the subject of the lecture, that the diversity of the points of view constitutes today, in many respects, such a strategy. Each time that we seek to spread truths, it is because we make an agreement with the class of people. There is such an aspiration that the research benefits the art of an agreement concerning the nature of disagreements. There is a case of agreement on the difference between the importance of the rules of the agreement on the disagreements. But, to quote Jocelyn Renoir, which is one of the propositions that came out during the round table during the day, to open the logic of the world. The most central question in the debate on mathematics is that of a realistic interdiction of the two classes for the diversity of the two.

17:30 If we take into account that the diversity of the two classes differs in some way from the moment of the ordinary judgment, we can therefore say that the prolongation of the two classes is what makes it easier. In other words, there is no contradiction between the dual position between the data and the science, and the expansion of the scale of the value of the vehicle, but rather a deployment, by the way, as presented in this example 5, without even having had to get out of the most food-eating table. I think that this is a fundamental point, given the necessary openness of the logic against the georegulation of the California and the United States. In other words, all significations, whether it is a dinosaur, on which all this can be based, namely the discrimination of the artist, will not be reduced. In other words, by highlighting all the points of discrimination between real and fake, we take into account that it is placed as a neural network, but it is by nature the case for all participants of mathematical mathematics. In short, here again, it is about simultaneously holding the two fixed points of a big body, which are figure and subject. So let's go back to our experience. How do we give a precise sense to this formula when we interpret sigma equals 7 as P? First of all, the choice of sigma can be understood as an application. Sigma equals 7. If we write sigma equals 7, it means that sigma and 7 must be of the same nature, of the same homogeneity. Therefore, the 7 that is there must also be the multiplication of m by 2. We will note that, not only one element of 2, but also the multiplication.

20:00 There is also m plus 7. We will then arrange the components of the first example of the object, which is, on the one hand, And on the other hand, there is a set of coincidences between these, namely in the present case, with Morse, the author of a different pact between the two, we are talking about a 3, sigma equals 7 between the two, there is 7 equals 7 equals M, that is, for the group, 7 equals 7, and then sigma equals sigma, so all sigma equals sigma, in the case of M, Because I asked you to choose an element if you want. In this case, sigma is not defined on the whole of the mantle of the frontier and does not exist in the whole of the two. And in the case of the mantle, it is not the same as sigma of m. It is exactly the same in this case with the definition of sigma, that is to say with the part of the mantle on which the choice of sigma has precisely been realized. In the equations of Laguio, this is written. The sigma of 2x7 is equal to p, this is equal to 1x2 of 2x7 is equal to m, and this is equal to 2x2 of 2x7 is equal to 1x2 of 2x7 is equal to 1x2 of 2x7 is equal to 1x2 of 2x7 is equal to 1x2 of 2x7 is equal to 1x2 of 2x7 is equal to 1x2 of 2x7 is equal to 1x2 of 2x7 is equal to 1x2 of 2x7 is equal to 1x2 of 2x7 is equal to 1x2 of 2x7 is equal to 1x2 of 2x7 is equal to 1x2 of 2x7 is equal to 1x2 of 2x7 is equal to 1x2 of 2x7 is equal to 1x2 of 2x7 is equal to 1x2 of 2x7 is equal to 1x2 of 2x7 is equal to 1x2 of 2x7 is equal to 1

22:30 Based on the values of numbers multiplied by quantum particles, we define a category where objects are characterized by the data of a set of elements and by the relations of coincidences between these elements related to the values of numbers. I would like to limit here to two other examples, which are easy to understand, there is no relationship of coincidences to be specified because there is no element present, but this one. There are two elements that we can call support, with the relations of coincidence, which are P and P, P equals Q equals Q, and P equals Q equals 1, which is the same as the value of truth for these relations. So these two objects, A0 and A1, are they really different, or would they not designate two more distinct variants? The answer to this question depends on the definition of the arrows between the objects. To say that it is essentially the same object, that is to say, to define the molecules, that the arrows are those that we have, effectively, at zero, or rather, at one.

25:00 And on the background, we see that, for example, art as a whole, in fact, there is the decadence of an ensemble that consists, in a way, of keeping the open spaces, but also of passing points, more precisely, to consider the structures, the elements that are essential to this process, but without necessarily, at the fourth level of humanization,