Renaud Chorlay / Erhard Scholz / Jean-Jacques Szczeciniarz REHSEIS, Paris 2007
← All recordings

Recorded at REHSEIS, Paris (2007), featuring Renaud Chorlay, Erhard Scholz, Jean-Jacques Szczeciniarz. From the Michael Wright Collection, held by the Archive Trust for Research in Mathematical Sciences & Philosophy.

Identifier
mw0000078-cc-b_p
Format
Audio recording
Collection
Michael Wright Collection
Repository
Archive Trust for Research in Mathematical Sciences & Philosophy
Rights
Made available for personal scholarly use. Rights in recordings are generally held by the speakers or their estates. If you believe this recording infringes your rights, please contact [email protected].
Transcript
Read the automatically generated transcript

This transcript was generated by speech-recognition software from an archival recording and has not been hand-corrected. It will contain recognition errors — particularly for proper names and technical terminology — so please verify against the audio before quoting. Timestamps play the recording from that moment.

0:00 Certain parts of 100 years of mathematics against, let's say, what I mean, just to express it somehow, the more dramatic point of view of a, let's say, let's put it that way, of tradition. Thank you very much for your time. The focus is on points in which mathematicians are not at all sensitive. The way we work with Poincaré is through the frame itself, it is the description of the frame, even before the description of the objects, the frame was the same. This is an example of the way in which the lecture is presented, the way in which the lecture is presented, the way in which the lecture is presented, the way in which the lecture is presented, the way in which the lecture is presented, the way in which the lecture is presented, the way in which The access to the results, the central results, I think, is more the emphasis on the human result that we are looking for than the support of all the elements.

2:30 And in our work, we see precisely the data on which we are able to work. I think this is something that is obviously very, very important. There are a number of things, of course, questions that you ask yourself when looking at the thesis, with all the questions that are asked and the parts that are a bit different. There are some parts that are quite identical. This, by the way, is often the case. There are problems that also relate to the analysis of mathematics at some point. All of these fields are related to the period of the 113rd, the re-reading of the human experience and the appearance of the theory of the 114th, the appearance of the theory of the 114th, the appearance of the theory of the 114th, the appearance of the theory of the 114th, the appearance of the theory of the 114th, the appearance of the theory of the 114th.

5:00 At the same time, as you mentioned earlier about the differences between the competitors, you talked about Montserrat and Pessimale, or the class of Walsh, and you mentioned the idea of the sum of the sum of the sum of the sum of the sum of the sum of the sum of Thank you for your attention.