Euler, Maxwell, Grothendieck & mathematical representation of cohesion of space (contd.)

0:00 I have to go there. I have to go there. I have to go there. I have to go there. Thank you very much for your attention and I hope to see you again in the next lecture. Thank you for your attention. Thank you for your attention. The rest of the news may be interesting for you to look at there. The first time I saw him, I thought he was a genius, but for me, he was part of my class.

2:30 There are a number of different fields of study, including mathematics, geometry, algebra, mathematics, physics, physics, and mathematics. There are a number of different fields of study, including mathematics, geometry, algebra, mathematics, physics, and mathematics. There are a number of different fields of study, including mathematics, geometry, algebra, mathematics, physics, and mathematics. There are a number of different fields of study, including mathematics, geometry, algebra, mathematics, physics, and mathematics. There are a number of different fields of study, including mathematics, geometry, algebra, mathematics, physics, and mathematics. There are a number of different fields of study, including mathematics, geometry, algebra, mathematics, physics, and mathematics. There are a number of different fields of study, including mathematics, geometry, algebra, mathematics, physics, and mathematics. There are a number of different fields of study, including mathematics, geometry, algebra, mathematics, physics, and mathematics. Thank you for your attention. The thing is that I have to learn one number from the last thing. I have an idea. I have to give him his air ticket. I have to give him his air.

5:00 Do you hear something? How are things? Thank you for your attention. And this morning is our order's release. Thank you for your attention.

7:30 Thank you for your attention. What is going on here? I think it's going to fall short, fall short, fall short. I'm not touching it. Which number I shouldn't? Which number you not want me to touch? Someone on the phone. Roger. Well, if we're only going to crack the door open, then fine. If we're not, then I think we have to press it. Let's start, guys. Oh, I join you. Sure, sure. You know we can start, guys. I get it. Yeah, sure. Thank you very much for your attention. Thank you for your attention.

10:00 I don't know because there's a lot of stuff in the message. Well, that's it. We're going to wait for Gérard Figueux. I think we're going to wait for Gérard Figueux. Let's go, let's go. Okay, let's go. We're going to wait for him. I've certainly told you that there's a problem with all of these candidates. It's not a political assumption. It's just a kind of construction. All of it. All of it. All of it. All of it. All of it. All of it. All of it. All of it. All of it. All of it. All of it. All of it. All of it. All of it. All of it. All of it. All of it. All of it. All of it. All of it. All of it. All of it. Thank you for watching.

17:30 Yeah, I'll run around and get you a new arm. And of course there were political factors to do with the various factions inside the church, too. The Jesuits were always, you know, against the Pope, because they couldn't really come out hopefully, and so they were against him, but of course they were always maneuvering. And the various religious orders all maneuvering with their own agendas and clearly some of us saw they wanted to pass the bomb to their time and that turned it inside out from within. What's his name? Bruno. Bruno Bruno. Where should we go? Yeah. Okay. Right. Not by me. No, you don't have to. Yeah, yeah. Well, you know, do you think there's structure in this? Actually, one other question was about structure. Does this account for the future for right now, actually, and I say leave this idea of structure, or is it still something else?

20:00 This is something a very big deal different from mathematics by nature, something a very big deal different. Mathematical objects are simpler than objects in mechanics. Yeah, yeah, it's not the same thing. They can be represented, I think. Objects can be represented in object structures, in dynamic structures. I mean, the structures, if you specialize in variables, if these definitions are not unique, the same objects can be described as so different from object structures. And of course it is, and if I can just say, and it's incorrectness on skills to say that structures are all there is, and so it's completely back with an empty notion of structure, instead of a sort of ophthalmological structure. Yeah, that's because you're going to die from it, you're not going to die from it. Am I saying it? Yeah, he's not going to die from it. No, he's going to die from it. No, he's going to die from it. No, he's going to die from it. No, he's going to die from it. No, he's going to die from it. No, he's going to die from it. No, he's going to die from it. No, he's going to die from it. No, he's going to die from it. No, he's going to die from it. No, he's going to die from it. No, he's going to die from it. No, he's going to die from it. No, he's going to die from it. No, he's going to die from it. For the night of January, yes, I have, yes, I have already replied to it saying that there seems to be an awful lot of players on the field. Come on guys, before you catch cold. Thank you for your attention. Thank you for your attention.

22:30 Let's get settled in. Oh yes, sure, um... ...and possibly for our speaker as well. Possibly a good top grog for you as well, if it turns into a flower, a head-cult turns into a flower. They have a set menu here on the... we'll put painting in there, don't worry, it's not a speaker, but painting on the back is quite a bit of an effect that they have on the floor behind us. Oh, it's on there, that was a shock. Thank you for your attention. It's a very good lab. I'm going to have a... I'm just going to have a... I think I'll have the ceiling go out.

25:00 The long on the board, the chair go on, and the long on the board, and the following, with rice and some vegetables. I got new, it's lamb. Lamb. Thank you for your attention. Speakers include mathematics, geometry, algebra, mathematics, physics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, If you think that's true, you should just admit in the audience. I think I'll copy you. I'll emulate you. Sorry, I'm very good. So you're still having to see the language, are you? Because I thought that the metro was almost back to normal today. I saw on the chat, it was worse than yesterday.

27:30 I mean, honestly, there's a lot to be said about this. There's a lot to be said about this. There's a lot to be said about this. There's a lot to be said about this. Just before I went to the Dolphins, I went back to the restaurant, it was closed, so I went to the bar in the street where the night camera was, because I had the television on, and they were saying that it was an act of satire, and there were 24 or 27 people injured, and this looks new, I think, very obvious. Thank you for your attention. Thank you for your attention. In that case, it's better to keep it clear. Thank you for your attention.

30:00 Thank you for your attention. I mean, I've got a snob about me, but I need to switch back over to red wine, which is the best thing that red wine and fish taste for, the combination of the two. Thank you for your attention. Thank you for your attention. Thank you for your attention. Thank you for your attention.

32:30 You knew what was coming next, but you didn't know what was coming next. I could very much smile if you're very aware of that. Yeah, I look for the best parts of the videos and that's it. So you want to get more of that? Yeah, yeah, yeah. I think because of... Thank you for your attention. Thank you. Thank you for your attention. So this was the title of David Johnson's talk on the question, do you believe in sort of a mind-boggling thinking, and do you believe in everything in this job here, which kind of might come in and that's why I'm not even starting to feel all this. When are you going to be the first person to answer this question? I'm going to be the first person to answer this question. Is there some kind of new thing to me that you need to test? Yes, yes, I think so. In terms of what's on your list, what do you need? Subtitles by the Amara.org community

35:00 Thank you for your attention. There are a number of different fields of study, including mathematics, geometry, algebra, mathematics, physics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, mathematics, mathematics, mathematics, mathematics, mathematics, mathematics, mathematics, mathematics, mathematics, mathematics, mathematics, mathematics, mathematics, But the point is that you're modeling with the screens within the area. I would love to hear some of our students sitting down here at the same place, and I would love to hear some of our students sitting down here at the same place, Thank you for your attention.

37:30 You can always do that. Thank you very much for your attention. I don't know if you can see, but some of the words are complicated. I don't know if you can see, but some of the words are complicated. I don't know if you can see, but some of the words are complicated. I don't know if you can see, but some of the words are complicated. I don't know if you can see, but some of the words are complicated. I don't know if you can see, but some of the words are complicated. I don't know if you can see, but some of the words are complicated. I don't know if you can see, but some of the words are complicated. I don't know if you can see, but some of the words are complicated. I don't know if you can see, but some of the words are complicated. I don't know if you can see, but some of the words are complicated. Thank you for watching. Thank you for your attention. Thank you for your attention.

40:00 Thank you for your attention. And obviously, depending on the kind of variation that's being characterized, it may be the most appropriate to be. Speakers include mathematics, geometry, algebra, analysis, quantum mechanics, physics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum Mathematics, mathematics of physics, mathematics of physics, mathematics of physics, mathematics of physics, mathematics of physics, mathematics of physics, mathematics of physics, mathematics of physics, mathematics of physics, mathematics of physics, mathematics of physics, mathematics of physics, mathematics of physics, mathematics of physics, mathematics of physics, In relation to nature, really, who is it? There are also a number of fields of study, such as mathematics, geometry, algebra, mathematics, physics, physics, mathematics theory, algebra, mathematics, physics theory, mathematics, physics theory, mathematics, physics theory, mathematics, physics theory, mathematics, physics theory, mathematics, physics theory, mathematics, physics theory, mathematics, physics theory, mathematics, physics theory, mathematics, physics theory, mathematics, physics theory, mathematics, physics theory, mathematics, physics theory,

42:30 Thank you for your attention. All of this is universal, universal, universal, universal, universal, universal. So, that's about all of the dismissing shrines. There are also a number of other fields of study, such as quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics, And we know, therefore, that there are a number of different types of mathematics in physics, and we know therefore that there are a number of different types of mathematics, and we know therefore that there are a number of different types of mathematics in physics, and we know therefore that there are a number of different types of mathematics in physics. I'm happy about finishing the book, which I really think is the best type symbol of the story, but it's a Ferrero type thing, you know what I mean, right? How many years ago? I really read very carefully the whole thing, and I don't get it. Did you read the book? I thought it was a movie, but it's not.

45:00 I think it's a couple of years ago, but I can't remember. I can't remember, but I thought it was a movie. Thank you for your attention. Thank you for watching. I think we have moved him in the right direction. I don't think his last book is too bad. I'll tell you, where she says, what is it, what is it set? Thank you for your attention. I was actually puzzled when you told me that last night about Goethe. I mean, that was only last night. I hadn't known. But isn't it revealing that the mathematicians and philosophers in that back period of the 19th century were part of a form of mathematical philosophy? Mathematics was completely equal to quantum physics.

47:30 And you must have told me that. No, don't think so. Thank you for your attention. I think she was the greatest philosopher in mathematics at that point in time. Well, I wouldn't say that she was quite the great philosopher. I think she was quite the great philosopher. I think she was quite the great philosopher. I think she was quite the great philosopher. I think she was quite the great philosopher. I think she was quite the great philosopher. I think she was quite the great philosopher. Thank you for watching. They might know about the theory of rings, or they might know about, you know, mathematical theory. Collin will fill you in to the ballet. Collin will give you all the necessary information. Thank you very much, you need to come.

50:00 I'm sorry, I'll put it this way. Connick, I'm sorry, um... Tachyon is a precise term, a precise one, as it's found in Witten, in Histoire, in Histoire, and luckily it stands for unit or a circle, and we keep this terminology of the period of our time as something long-term, and we do a lot of research also in mathematics, and some of it is very carefully stolen, history, for example, the lady down there, Cathy Sheppard, who is a wonderful, great, great, great, great, great, great. Thank you for your attention. Here's one of the very, very, very good ones. And a guy who I'm very sorry won't be with me because he's teaching this morning. He can't be standing under it. He'll be with us shortly round the bend. Very good basis on the history of the brain. And on the general development of the brain, how to understand it, the distinction between global and non-global, and human. Very good thing, very. The one who we were talking to at the IHP in the last month here, he might be fact-checked, I suppose, in the chair of the jurors, but yeah, he's a commentator, he's a commentator. I'm sure Renaud Shaw is on the phone. He's on the phone. He's on the phone. He's on the phone. He's on the phone. He's on the phone. He's on the phone. He's on the phone. I got the line, it's rather hard for a person here to get on the right side of the box, very very precise and clear, and it's very much a reminder of what I've learned from this course, and what I've grown to do over the years.

52:30 Anyway, research there, where people are going to run on this course, has, I don't know how much time, has got some very large growth. It's not only Recise, it's not the second director. Recise is the second director. I don't know the answer to those as well, but the question is, you've got to go on about two million dollars. There are a number of different fields of study in the field of mathematics, such as physics, geometry, algebra, algebra, algebra, algebra, algebra, algebra, algebra, algebra, algebra, algebra, algebra, algebra, algebra, algebra, algebra, algebra, algebra, algebra, algebra, I really want to find out more about the new ideas that are given to us, and that is why we have suddenly found it very interesting to ask students to pay for a positional history class, because you don't want to know about a major class, you dare to say no, you don't want to know about one or two, one or two of the two. So, maybe just one. I have very, very great suspicions. There's a kind of temple style that you know I have this one point. I say temple style. I was telling Bill last night, I said that right, about your own knowledge and what you were saying to me about the temple the other day, about what is the subject of your lecture. But there is books on, well, you know, mathematics and physics. I was hearing about that in the library.

55:00 In order that it can properly record... The history, philosophy, and mathematics of the past, and in this day, in this decade, you hit me with a couple of things. One has to do with reporting on pseudo-physicists, pseudo-physicists, pseudo-physicists, pseudo-physicists, pseudo-physicists, pseudo-physicists, pseudo-physicists. It doesn't convince the real audience of the idea of superhuman law. It's accepting it anyway. Thank you for your attention. But you've certainly seen it before. You've certainly seen the damage that can be done in mathematics and physics. And it's getting worse, isn't it? Because, of course, we've gone down the right path. Oh, and much of the present history, at least in France, you still have, but you've been talking about it too much, but you still have, a serious level of state funding designed to do research. Now in England, the whole thing's been thrown away. Thank you. Thank you for your attention.

57:30 There are a number of different types of science. There are different types of science. There are different types of science. There are different types of science. There are different types of science. There are different types of science. There are different types of science. There are different types of science. There are different types of science. There are different types of science. There are different types of science. There are different types of science. There are different types of science. Many of the fellows who attended the lecture, particularly Christy, are topologists. In fact, there are just over 500 fellows who did this. I'm sure there are a few of you who have done this. Thank you for your attention. The key terms may include mathematics, geometry, algebra, analysis, quantum mechanics, physics, quantum mechanics, physics, quantum mechanics, physics, quantum mechanics, physics, quantum mechanics, physics, quantum mechanics, physics, quantum mechanics, physics, quantum mechanics, physics, quantum mechanics, physics, quantum mechanics, physics, quantum mechanics, Thank you for your attention.

1:00:00 Thank you very much. Thank you for your attention. Thank you for your attention. Thank you for your attention. Thank you for your attention.

1:02:30 The Templin Foundation is pretty well trained and straightforward in how they relate to subject matter, but I don't know about the Templin Foundation. Thank you for your attention. No, let's not, let's downplay rigor, perhaps, with people who are speculative, who live in this room. I mean, is there, I mean, I'm sure they do have a lot of practice, but I'm just wondering what it is. I mean, did Jaffe and his friends, and they're religious, and they're not religious, and they're not religious, and they're not religious, and they're not religious, and they're not religious, and they're not religious, and they're not religious, and they're not religious, and they're not religious, All of these are presented in a trilogy, which is one of the most important parts of the book. The idea of this trilogy is that it is a sort of literature. It is a sort of literature. It is a sort of literature. It is a sort of literature. It is a sort of literature. It is a sort of literature. It is a sort of literature. It is a sort of literature. It is a sort of literature. Thank you for your attention. Thank you for your attention.

1:05:00 There's a vile connection also with the slack-lateral structure of this great term, the term of literate, the sexual, the representational, the thing that it is a representation of and insists that, ontologically, the representations are all the same. I hope you enjoyed this video. If you did, please like, share, and subscribe to the channel, and don't forget to click the bell icon to get notified of new videos every week. He's the guy, he's the head, honcho of FQX. He's the head of the committee. FQX, yeah, about a couple of years back, maybe about that, maybe 18 months ago, they made their first round of awards, I think, about this kind of thing. But they have a lot of money, I mean, because they're giving, I mean, they're giving, they're giving 50,000. Cows do very well. Cows do very well. Cows do very well. Cows do very well. Cows do very well. Cows do very well. They give about 30 or 40,000 stars every year and they make money with 50,000 and that's over 100,000 pounds and you know you get it for free but you'll have to submit a part of it and it's got to be something that will, something with you to connect with and make you a part of it. The work which, work in cosmology, which have a bearing on this kind of, well in fact that kind of mystical word soundbite doesn't tell you where they're coming from, but I hadn't realised until now, that they are just a straight pun, pun, pun, pun.

1:07:30 The problem of knowledge is not just about knowledge, but about the moment we are going to use it. There are two paths. One is to embrace the various and different desires, and the other is to embrace the theories that have been inspired by scientists and mathematicians talking about the creation of the law, a test like voting for war. But on the other hand, you have to have another way of activity. Thank you for watching. Mathematics is still not the key. Even though a plane may get a very valid form on the surface, at the same time, in general, the centralization of a plane is understandable, but it seems to be separate one way or another. If you can't see that, you must be some kind of philistine or anything like that. Of course, you'll never understand what Witten is doing, but just to take it from Daddy, this is really deep. Yes, it is great. It's a good video. And one of the things you told me that I haven't heard, which I find to be very chilling, is that apparently, Campbellton recently ran a very big course for writing climate journals. I'm not sure if it's from all over the world or just from the UK and the US, but anyway, they ran this big course in Cambridge and indoctrinated the speakers on the science of mathematics, how to write science of mathematics, and so on and so forth.

1:10:00 This group are very, very custodians of the class, quite many. If you won't. Well, if you won't. Well, because Cambridge is one of the two of the most prestigious universities in the world, and the other half, yeah, because Cambridge is one of the two of the most prestigious universities in the world, one of the most powerful universities in the world, and because, you know, the chair, the chair of Cambridge, the chair of, you know, the kind of people who read science books at the level of science American or scientists or... They look up and reveal Hawking was kind of, you know, a demigod, but it's a romantic kind of, you know, perfectionist group of odd-in-a-wheelchairs with children, and not with geniuses, and he's, you know, and this is the university where all of this beauty is coming from, beautiful mathematics, and teaching with authority. Thank you for your attention. And of course universities like Cambridge never turn down, when Bill Gates gets out his cheque for them and writes a $20 million cheque for them, or when Mr. Hamilton gets out his cheque for them and writes a $100 million cheque, do you really think the master of charity or the Chancellor of Cambridge or the Chancellor of Cambridge has to be the highest priest? Do you believe anybody? Do you believe that the chancellorship is more his honor? They still should be on the logon, theoretically. I mean, do you really think that they come in such an approach, you could say? Yes, it's weird. Should we visit them?

1:12:30 I mean, do you think that they come in such an approach, you could say? I mean, do you think that they come in such an approach, you could say? I mean, do you think that they come in such an approach, you could say? I mean, do you think that they come in such an approach, you could say? I mean, do you think that they come in such an approach, you could say? I mean, do you think that they come in such an approach, you could say? I mean, do you think that they come in such an approach, you could say? I mean, do you think that they come in such an approach, you could say? The most famous and the most influential economists that exist, institutions, institutions of the world, institutions produced in the 19th century, have the famous synagogues and that, because in the long run we're all dead, so I just want to change it, and shortly after I want to take some more celebrations and say, politically in this, I think, you know, I think, I don't think, I don't think... I don't say that they're all individually different. You know, like some math you don't know. But you've brought it in any way. It's been known by prestige, by the esteem of your peers, by having some sort of respect for you, that I've been given to you. There are a number of ways in which we can run in our own way. There are also many other fields of study, such as mathematics, geometry, algebra, mathematics, physics, physics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, physics, mathematics, Well, Sir Michael will give you the official description pretty well, because it's very important that Cambridge remain one of the world's most important universities, one of the world's most important universities, which, of course, has enjoyed ever since Newton, well, which he knows. Yes, absolutely. Yes, that's right. And it's very, very important that Cambridge remain one of the great world centers of mathematics and physics. And... So the college system, with all its great, great benefits for, well, first of all, for the wealth of the colleges, nonetheless, you know, there is an argument that it does slightly get in the way of that, and we should have something more like, basically, we should have something similar to what the print press does.

1:15:00 Thank you very much for your time, and I look forward to seeing you again soon. Some of this perhaps is the wrong word, but there's something else going on here. Why at that particular time did they seem to think it was so important to them? It's a great deal of money. I mean, Trinity gave away, well, they've got so much endowment, they might go more accordingly in the way that they've done before. They gave away a really quite substantial chunk of their endowment. They might be needing more than 10% in order to build. And that we get the land as well. And they've built this amazing building with a tremendous amount of tech support and very prestigious people. Range these semester in what they judge to be the most important branches of mathematics. Why that distinction? Good question. Very good question. And why? Why specifically Cambridge? It's the same guy who gave them the largest donation amount that any university has ever been given, at about $20 billion, literally $20 billion. Gates gave $20 billion! I agree with you. And he could have done worse things with his $20 billion. He could have done worse things with his $20,000, but at least that would have been for a lot of people doing a lot of serious science, and it would be fine.

1:17:30 But there will also be a hell of a lot of people, you know, Microsoft will be able to cover up as their top of attention is, whatever it is. I mean, I'm sure he's not doing it terribly much, but no, I'm inclined to agree with you. Given that we live in a capitalist system, given that there are going to be powerful, very rich people creating their foundations, I think Gates will be a hell of a long way from the top of my hate list. I mean, he's still a monopoly capitalist, in fact Microsoft is some monopoly, isn't it? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yes, he is a good man. He's very good at being a monopolist. But then so is Rockefeller. And there is this difference that, you know, John B. Rockefeller, you know, just had an awful lot of people killed, like anybody who's, you know, Thank you very much for your attention and I look forward to seeing you again next time. I don't mean to, but I'm not sure I can do it. There's some entrance up there. It's just that publish... Yeah, they get published. Oh, I see. Oh, I see. It's just that a lot of them seem to be... There were some articles that I saw in the center.

1:20:00 Thank you for watching. Thank you for your attention. There's a few of them available, but there was another aspect to it. He was working on it, and he saw that it was going to be more and more and more and more complex. The reason I was burned by the church was because of that. Because of that, they get away with the idea that he was some kind of progressive hero. And in fact, his basic task was to maintain the old, the old system, not the new system. I believe on different planets, but pure, pure, pure... I'm surprised Simon and Copernic or Valéry have got some kind of science plan, but it's still a very thorough plan that we're working on to sound it out. It's becoming obvious that they're working on something else. They did that, well, to explain it. It's more of a... It's more effectively smarter than that. Thank you for your attention.

1:22:30 They see those things as here. They see those things as here. They see those things as here. There is a mystery. Thank you for your attention. It wasn't that he was some kind of, you know, assembly train surgeon, and the quarrel was over a very specific theological issue, whether the king would call himself that or not. And so, the Lord Chancellor of England took him to the court of Campanella, who was not very good at the time, and his plan was for a worldwide, peer-to-peer partnership with Poland, but he decided that the French, perhaps both, although the French on the other hand, weren't very good at the time, and he decided that the French were not very good at the time, and he decided that the French were not very good at the time, and he decided that the French Thank you for your attention. Thank you for your attention.

1:25:00 Thank you for your attention. Thank you for your attention. I think I have got the chronology right. You've gone through, you know, there's a big generation out there, I have to say. Well, I will definitely go and Google him and learn a bit more about him. I think I've got it all mixed up. No, I don't think you have. I think you've done a pretty good job. I think you've done a pretty good job. Of course, he's a beauty. Thank you very much for your attention.

1:27:30 The 23rd of April is the 23rd of April, the 23rd of April is the 23rd of April, the 23rd of April is the 23rd of April, the 23rd of April is the 23rd of April, Thank you very much for your attention. Thank you for your attention. Thank you for your attention. I'm just hoping my card is going to take the pounding. I have got some cash, but I wouldn't be able to find it. Probably my, my, my, uh, hotel is going to be closed, and then all these people are going to come to see me. So I'll do this. Thanks. Yeah, that's, that's fine. Right, okay, okay, that's good. The conference is on the 5th of November at the National Library.

1:30:00 No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. Yeah, I thought you mentioned you did much more than that. I've been getting a few questions. Oh, yes, I know. I think you've said a lot about consciousness on the on the on the on the on the on the Thank you for your attention. Thank you for your attention. Thank you very much for your attention.

1:32:30 Thank you for your attention. In one of the early papers, you say something like, in various forms, you said, do you still re-prove that? Because I somehow reconstructed that probably you just didn't re-prove it. I will explain it that way now. What was my argument exactly was that you don't need to limit yourself to something invariant, it's invariant you don't vary, you don't see the variation, it's super general that way, but that would help you understand it, but I think it's something behind it. Thank you for your attention.

1:35:00 There are two different notions of equality in abstract sense, two categories, one is the same, or essentially the same, equality can never be the same, in terms of real interpretations, again in this process, what do you call it, this convoluted process, the world is dialectical. Thank you for your attention. There are other levels that might not be, but then we purview this and abstract the ideas from a category, particularly the one that worked as an invertible once, and again, then we learn, well, we have to be careful because naturalized work is one thing and individualized work is another thing, and then we come to two categories, and then we come to three categories, and then we come to four categories. Thank you for your attention. Yeah, I mean, equality is probably, can you just, I don't know, replace equality by a multiple number of... This can lead to a big technology. But to argue that you can make a great mystery out of it, or to even argue that you can do it out of the crisis of some other kind.

1:37:30 He's handily pushing you off the other one. There are a number of categories of physics that still have rigid qualifications and arise from various categories. If you're given a category of physics, it's good if you don't have a category. I saw an equally precise one on both of you. In other words, it's basically a fiber category that's slightly less than the other. But he doesn't want to say they're less. The variation is not precisely controlled, so because of that lack of control, there is an additional future value, an additional structure, an additional future value. I saw a published paper, I think it's a category, to try to analyze it, but I wouldn't do that. I would try to make sense of the language, and to send them to South America. The problem is that you can't get rid of them. You have to make sure you're on the edge between their existence and just having them. You just have to believe them, given the proof.

1:40:00 And this is the way that they should think about it. Well, but isn't the whole point to understand how it works in the setting of specific categories? We have a natural environment for modeling the features of the world around us, rather than to try to grasp some ineffable essence of our identity, there is a kind of biometrics that we act on and everything else we don't. That's precisely the attitude that comes from ignoring the too much of a research. But logic is absolute and underneath everything else. Everything else has to be interpretatively interpretative in terms of the metaphysically-given notions of some underlying reality. And then, of course, you will get hung up in debates about absolute identity. Is identity absolute? And, of course, the fregean notion of objects. Thank you for your attention. So, it's really, it's actually in a way the idea of two categories and so forth is described as dimension, and it's better than co-dimension because you are taking the world and you're pushing down one degree of, you see, and then maybe another degree, but you want the idea, the idea that you're trying to actually have a theory which is described as pushing all the way down is very wrong.

1:42:30 Mathematical, or physically, philosophical, reasonable, kind of view. But that's the main question, because pursuing that dream, you know, mathematics is not a good thing, but a lot of topology. It should distract people. Actually, it's a really good point, you know, from the beginning, you talked about something like basic level, and I think that's, myself, that's much better. This has been described by some philosophers as de-dialectical, that the people, society, and all the nations of nature, we make this, according to our information, go astray. In order to have a clear theory that can be used as a guide, insofar as the third wave doesn't matter. Or there are contexts in which it clearly doesn't matter. Yeah, so you have the possibility of being on the same level in all of them. And assuming that you're already done with all of these things, then you have... No, and this is the whole, sir, of the program. And your brain will appear, and you'll know. ...which is that until you've done the ultimate deepening here, the once and for all deepening, you can't even begin to do that, you see, because it hasn't been out of the one true logical theory of everything. Yeah, exactly, the global top element. It's just a crazy idea, and it's, well, it's certainly going to land you in mysticism, but that's part of the logical thought as well. I hope you enjoyed this video, and I'll see you in the next one.

1:45:00 I read a review, maybe you know there's this lady, I think she's in Paris, she wrote a review, a couple of months ago, about Charter. You know that she starts off by saying that in the 20th century there were two great mathematicians, Jordan and Karski, and she goes on and talks about Karski, but seems to put that in there. It's not right. Karski is a much greater... But the basic thrust of the theology is that it's going to be, well, it's going to be very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, I think that's quite a lot, to be accepted about this today, and the fact that you can have functions, even used as an example, an integral sign, an integral sign, as an analogy, is quantified, is better quantified by descending from the old value of functions to the new value of functions. I mean, big deal! Right? Well, the fact that they're edgewise, they didn't say that, but they do have a distinctive feature in general. Nonetheless, it's not that mystical. It's covered. Mathematicians were far ahead. They knew about quantum physics. Yes, sir. I'm Damon. Well, because the systems are making the extensions of concepts. We might as well identify the concept properly, it doesn't need to give much of an argument, so we might as well accept that it's illicit, that it's illicit, that it's illicit, that it's illicit, that it's illicit, that it's illicit, that it's illicit, that it's illicit, that it's illicit,

1:47:30 And, of course, the reason that he very rapidly turned out to be a physicist is that the idea of structure is much further than that. Even though, you know, set this, let G be a set, or exist a group, that's nothing. They use that as a legacy. I'm only saying that the concepts should be not identified. Structure is needed, because structure is the way, the three most important way of representing a concept is just an object. It's just like a vector, you see. A vector is just a kind of vector. It's not really a general definition of a vector. A concept is a non-object. But what about category as a representation? The other thing that Frege, of course, was pretty bad at, or good at, from your point of view, was raising the distinction between the domains of code and mathematics. You know, treating them as if they only had the lights. They have to distinguish the code from the code and write it down in an arbitrary column.

1:50:00 So now, mathematically, you may know what the code is. You don't know the range. But it has to be a codename that's going to hold it. Well, if you're starting that, then what is it? It's always the same. So mathematically, it's obvious, at least if you're in the context of the question statement, to make these codes. But the idea is very deceptive, is that there is no topology. Of course, that's how complex the problem is. Yeah, yeah. Reinhold, you see, Reinhold, being Jewish, was the worst. He said, of course, fire is the best of all. He didn't have any idea of that. He's not even, you see, he can talk to you. This is, he really is pure consciousness. He's not even going to go to school. He's not even going to go to school. And, of course, coding is as well. So he actually gave you this movement in the class number. He's pregnant, so he's actually really corrected that mistake. I was very interested in what you were saying last night, though, about your own idea about how to go about. The foundation of mathematics and what it was that you, which actually connects with what you just said, what you were and what it was that changed you and what you do and what you have to do to grow from here to where you are today. Can you, because I think our place would be very interesting here. It's the slurriness of the science, it's the big thing that's going down the line. I think the big idea was actually to say, you know, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, He points out that, you know, anybody naturally feels is interested in quantum mechanics. So he says, oh, yes, I agree with that. Here, let's take them to this table.

1:52:30 So then he idealizes them after the language. He idealizes them in terms of subjective idealism. Whereas the other guy just wants to do objective. So he idealizes them to idealize them in an objective idealism. There's an excuse between subjective and high objective idealism. The objective, I feel, is that when it's understood as something, it could be part of a screwing up, because that does involve a realization system. You could say, well, I could have had one of these processes, and it seems to be going on forever, and I'm going to live in something like this. It may be a sort of step that you make, don't you think? Of course, it does become a foundation for something. I don't know what to say about him. He was worried that he was going to turn it on and on and on and on. And that somehow the panther himself, when he started off, he was trapped in something bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger. And I think he was very, people often say, for example, this buyer promotes the ambiguity of beauty as opposed to the reasonable part of the buyer. I think if you read the notices in the official survey, the most actionary tens are. But anyway, he says that an additional slandering Euler is being eventually non-negative. He says that about his relations. No, he says that Cantor started off with theology and came upon its infinities due to theological motivation. Now, you have to ask José about this, but my idea is quite the opposite. He had this dream of going on and on, and he realized it in terms of theology, and therefore he went to the bishop or whoever, and he said, So you did go to the bishop and talk to him. Yeah, historically it's correct. But you didn't want to tread on their character. Absolutely.

1:55:00 But he's able to see that this does have an objective like you will see on the content. Very clear. By the way, who invented the word mathematics? I mean, for a natural moment. I think that's a big statement. Thank you for your attention and see you in the next lecture. Well, I certainly think it's not completely new to me, because, as it turns out, this idealization, however it may be, is different in different categories, and when you compare the categories, as you might also do, you will confront many funny contradictions between them, but the point is that Euler's was rigorous. And Cantor's visit to the commission was probably the only way to buy his idea, really, rather than, he was not looking for or caring about, you know, acceptance of academic colleges or something of that nature. I will investigate that very carefully. That's how he led. I think it is pretty clear that he was led. He did come to the topology. But I don't think it was his fault. Thank you for your attention. John Beck, Gordon Deak, Ben Apu. I mean, he's all casual. He's a self. He's a cheerleader. He's a dangerous fighter.

1:57:30 So anyway, I don't know much. Gordon Deak, you know, sort of taught us to have this innovation. Oh, we have to have a universe, yes, but then we need the next user. So much. So, you know, that's more a mess when it's set to your smell, really. I don't think that has anything to do with the facts. He wanted something, so that was the you. Certainly, rather than the girl very nice, he wants to have these, that kind of thing. What we want to have would be as if the ordinary citizen of the category of the category of the concept, which is not really ordinary, but it involves all sets of it, and its ordinary form over the general universe, you can exponentiate it to be to the power of E, and that is that you will be naive to go around to some version of E. That's, this is in my thesis. It was just, you know, it was an interesting trick, very nice, to introduce this idea that spell means the same thing as writing or something, and B is that it's written. It's striking, someone hung this up, but if you look in Perl's correspondence, I actually looked this up myself. But the course started with Bernays. In fact, this was in the same month that I was writing my thesis. February 16. And they were talking about categories, and MacLean had raised in Warsaw in 1959 an issue called The Book of Small Objects, again thinking in Bernays terms, because after all, it was a student of Bernays. But anyway, they put questions of large categories in the discussion, and Doodle says, well, I've heard that there's a person working on a categorical theory that comes from the Alps, and this person is of a odd name, but it must have been me. And Jeffermann, who's the editor...

2:00:00 If you conjecture that this is because you've been conduit to the National Academy of Sciences, then you're in trouble. You're in a national academy. It's all bullshit, conjecture. Janus Scott has a much more national theory, namely of Kreisel from California. I was in Berlin every day on the phone. Kreisel was a real hell of a doctor. And must have told him. Should I have talked to Kreisel from Stanford? I lived in Berkeley, but I didn't have to go to Stanford to talk to Kreisel about all these things. I didn't realize that those things were supposed to put things under your desk. So I talked to Geisel, and he told me, well indeed, Jean-Pierre Marquis gave an entire lecture about the order of forces. But anyway, my thought was, this is the background, so what do Gödel and Cernan say to each other? The first thing they say is, oh, so of course we need finite types above z. In other words, it's so, it's so ironical, people are so thirsty for fascist laws that they make it up themselves. So, so categorists have been running around the last 50 years talking about illegitimate categories, categories that don't submit to the law as laid down by Goodell and Paradise. Well, they themselves repealed it the instant they heard about categories. Oh, we don't need that, of course. They immediately saw that this would be consistent. It's not more indecisive, but given the models there, we can extract another category. It adds a V and a V and a V when they get all the elements in the original category. Without them, it's a simple, in a sense, too theoretically simple construction. So it's not more inconsistent or something. But they saw that immediately. Their book, Mathematicians, is not a couple of followers of the law. Illegitimate. So the word illegitimate should be totally bad. I'll never be able to do this.

2:02:30 It certainly is. It's just the logarithms themselves. Those are the very logarithms. Did you get the point? I didn't get the point. As a matter of fact, that's precisely the point I tried to get across to John Mabry when I was talking about this. So you've got to get the actual quotations of these letters. See, I knew nothing about the illegitimate categories, and I was making that point, but the ones that I've heard from you, that was something I figured out for myself. But it refers to some alleged laws, and well, the lawgivers are well-known. And they have themselves said, guys, this is all... History. We don't have this law, we don't need it anymore. I don't go in for this division of powers, I go in for the role of the Supreme Court. It's not needed to be... Not needed, isn't it? ...equated in America. Ah, interesting. You'd be good to get this, the actual quotation. Well, it must be in the... No, no, it is in the Verkman and Sedgwick, has a false information about it. It has a typo. Yeah, it has a typo. In terms of origin. Yeah. Yeah, but if we could have a precise location. Well, yes, I mean, it would be very easy to just go and look it up in the, I'm not sure which volume it would be in. It's clear. One of them is not clear. Yeah. See, I didn't know Bernhard, but it was a very nice, very sweet guy. I knew him when I was in Zurich. We invited him to this place at the time. He came to my seminar. He was an avid follower of the K-theory. He taught K-theory. I had no idea about this history at the time of the day. That's why I think basically, Steve Albrecht and his students, well, they're all in some sense on the wrong track. You know, they take this idea of a V, or a P if it's small, and it should be for 20 years, but it's not necessary.

2:05:00 But even in Rothenburg, I didn't read the whole world of mathematics. It seems kind of obscure, I mean, you don't play... Well, it's just the University of Mercedes doesn't really have something like that. The basic idea about the universes is that they do exist as points in the universe.