The chemical bond / Bohr's theory of the atom / Cassirer & Bohr QT / Wave particle duality (contd.)

0:00 In contrast to this, in the second study, in the third study, the length of symbolic knowledge is a different kind of intuition. In the Meditazione delle Commissioni del Dottorato d'Italia, the term is the length of symbolic knowledge among the different kinds of conditions. All knowledge is either pure or pure, and pure knowledge is either confused or easy. The least thing is in turn either dynamical or analytical. And again, primordial or intuitive. It is the most perfect knowledge to test the code, adequate and efficient. Kant explicitly reshaped that search for system and nuclear . The intuitive recognition must be constructed in a discourse, not through the primordial. Now, the formula. It is a dramatic, but meaningful demonstration of symbols after a presentation held in the United States. In spite of its use of sentient vocabulary, a serious concept of symbols pertains to the cognition. Symbolic knowledge is, therefore, the intuition. However, we are in the midst of this pre-eminent intellectual division, the remit of which we met in the Udenes Reconciliator Medical of Concepts, Persons in the Composite Mind. Atiyah asserted that involuntary knowledge should be considered as a monster as opposed to something like sensory information, which is always related to sense, time, and empirical knowledge. In fact, Atiyah wrote a book, The History of Natural Philosophy, from Aristotle to Galileo, about the progressive abandonment of sensory knowledge. But this view is in some of the other languages, and we think of the classical physics argues that the form which is born of physical knowledge is not a state, but in the first place, logic. Therefore, according to our theory, to reach the concentration of our knowledge from sense to linguistics lies offering the role to the universal community of science.

2:30 However, the history of philosophy does not follow this path. We set the possibility of a relational sense to the representation of the world. We maintain the thought that the world can be viewed as an autonomous part of the economy. In effect, can't put it in the way that the economy is going to be efficient. We understand the truth in the language of can't change the exponential momentum. In other words, the theoretical theory of general relativity. It has already shown that the mathematical triune performs the pure form of sensitivity based on time. Counting the spectral matters here and then cannot be accepted anymore. Thus, the very development of physical knowledge has shown that Kant's theory of intuition is absolutely valid. In this sense, according to Kant, it is the very evolution of physics that shows against Kant's position. The necessity of a democratic renunciation of synthetic features in favor of symbolic applications, I hope that is. And thus physics has definitely met the need of representation and of representation in general for the North African world. The genesis of chemistry has been cutting away to the symbolism of physics. And this is particularly true in quantum theory. As Katerina says, atomic physics cannot be constructed without the examination of the equation for the solution of the problem. In the US, Katerina argues that it is better to present ourselves with the mathematical simulation of the laws of the theory than refrain from any simulation of the equation. As Katerina says, the more the conceptual determination progresses, the less it will force us to fix its results in simple practical expectations. We shall be dissatisfied with the termination of mathematical logic and must forgo any clarification to be made. In the following, we shall turn to both views, according to which quantum physics does not provide us with the potential for the activity of natural objects and products.

5:00 However, we shall see that, precisely for this reason, and in compensation to Katira's view, Bohm maintains that the physical reference of quantum theory depends on classical descriptions of measurable results, which do provide us with special technology, so it is time to work with it. Two terms may be distinguished in which Bohm considers our knowledge to be symbolic, and we call them the broad and the strict. In the first place, our knowledge is symbolic because our concepts are not to resemble a transcendent reality. But they will only help us to extend an order of economics, meaning physics. For example, the task of science is both to extend the range of our experience and to reduce it to order. This means that in our description of nature, the purpose is not to disclose the real essence of economics, but only to track down the prophecy-disposal relation between the mathematical aspects of physics. In particular, physics is to be regarded not so much as a study of something a priori, but rather as a development of methods of following and finding units. At this point, we also coincide with Castile . These scientific concepts are valid, not in that they copy the fixed given being, but in comparison contain a plan for possible construction of units. Which must be proven to be centrally practiced in application to the field of mathematics. We need not the activity of absolute things, but rather the objective and the miniscule of the methods of physics. And classical physics. What considers particularly the world is the knowledge of what cannot be directed into the future.

7:30 A combination of these take on three terms only for the field to be watched, because some of the objects present in this algebraic integral in space and time seem like a web, and don't make sense yet. The idea is that the three terms of things work well on one side, but the quantum mechanical formalism is symbolic because its concepts cannot be represented directly in the future. She is the head of both the matrix and the wave function. Moreover, she learned that one of the main components was to put quantum symbols in the position of classical concepts. The latter can be seen in spatial temporal pictures, while the cognates cannot. On the other hand, Bohr maintains that classical concepts symbolize quantum objects and robots. One is not the concept of isolated particles and fluid radiations. We see quantum properties indirectly in intuition. These concepts are used in the term of a symbolic analysis. They are a structure for idealization, not to be interpreted as a theory. Neither quantum theory nor classical physics contains any representation which should be considered as the key to the essence of the conceptual reality. Our concepts have to inter-decide given phenomena in their experience as extended and unified as possible. However, the way in which the identification of experience is to be achieved should be differentiated from theories on classical physics. In the latter, a single all-embracing causal time-space energy conception is such a force in which all empirical data may be systematically arranged. In quantum theory, physics is the head, whereas, in quantum real, the unit of experience is expected to be at least in two steps. In the first one, a couple of other space-time features is employed, the number of inductors and physical data attributed to the center of the mental array.

10:00 In the second step, a graphical feature is employed, as in what kind of work to define the object. More on... Such a complex work is usually described in two conductors in a new kind of theory, a rational simulation of the theoretical structure, or an all-embracing, colorful representation of the theory of science. In any case, although we have to decide our wishes of direct, intuitive representation of quantum physics in favor of the moniker, we have to invent a direct, intuitive exhibition of classical concepts in order to make a conclusion. The pronunciation of pictorial representations involves only the effect of atomic hops or in the combination of the description of the experimental conditions as well as our theory of the future, and its events, and so forth. So, let me finish by summarizing the main differences between cathedrals, polygons, and polytheists, polytheists and polygons and polytheists. So, both, cathedral and wall. The science of quantum concepts cannot be explained to mathematicians in the way that classical concepts have. More concerns are the limitations of the direct implications of quantum concepts. It is not the end, but the beginning of the interpretation of the world of quantum theory. What complements complementarity is precisely introduced in order to regain the precision once the direct implications of quantum concepts are used. What's the truth? That is one of the questions. Since Heisenberg's and Schrodinger's formalisms cannot have a direct expedition in space and time, then there are intuitions that expeditions have to be direct, that is to say, to work. Therefore, I may whine a little bit, but you can feel that I miss any concept of teamwork that is clearly noted in the science and knowledge field, but we can't do that. Quantum symbolism is the goal, not to be at all true, but it's one of the kind powers to be in demand.

12:30 A theory states that the demand for the achievement and the unification of the graphic physical field cannot be met at the same time. In this sense, it is politically a thing, but it is not a thing at all. The tendency towards unification has turned over the tendency towards graphic imagination. But Katya's search in favor of the initiation against impotence seems to be in vain, because both Katya's position appears as impotent as the one of any of the other participants, which is to say that impotence prevails over the unity of physics. In the case of quantum theory, as is often viewed, there is a problem that the realization of impotence is important when it comes to the objective reality of the field. While we know that the duration of a theory is in fine character, its relationship with mathematical physics cannot be possibly different. Since a theory does not take a demand for replicants into account, it does not actively explain the systematic relationship between quantum theories and mathematics. Because these classical and mathematical theories just are too different in themselves. We are not being able to explain their systematic use. Concretely, it is enough to indicate that neither graphical nor quantum symbols are copies of the concept of the age. A following main point was explained by a theorist in order to give the perspective. In other words, it is the elimination of the theoretical and quantum theories, the theoretical and quantum theories, and the social analyses, that lead us to the truth. In other words, it is all in vain. In contrast to this, according to the The mathematics theory of quantum and algebra physics is precisely grounded in the use of

15:00 Thank you for your attention. Thank you for your attention. Grammar, I have a quotation by a grammar teacher. This grammar says, all have strength in themselves to discuss on some part of the story. Mathematical physics is only one of the few, taking up descriptions of nature, of all characters. They are not to be understood as any kind of problem.

17:30 The program is 50,000 minutes long, but very quickly we will close at 3 o'clock, and then we'll resume the class. So the first one is, what do you get from all of them? And then the second one is, what do you get from all of them? And then the third one is, what do you get from all of them? And then the fourth one is, what do you get from all of them? And then the fifth one is, what do you get from all of them? And then the sixth one is, what do you get from all of them? And then the sixth one is, what do you get from all of them? And then the seventh one is, what do you get from all of them? And then the eighth one is, what do you get from all of them? And then the sixth one is, what do you get from all of them? And then the seventh one is, what do you get from all of them? And then the seventh one is, what do you get from all of them? They can also be used to view the magnitude of the wave, the amplitude of the wave function, the probability of the wave being a particle, the equivalent of a particle.

20:00 There is a lot of work to be done on the mathematical theory of mathematics, geometry, mathematical physics, and the mathematical properties of physics and life. Thank you very much. I was trying to come to the next thing, the class of mathematics and the theory of quantum physics according to the theory of quantum mechanics and the theory of quantum mechanics. I focused on weight transfer and the importance of mathematics, what does it mean, and in theory there are two aspects to that. The first part is about the relationship between the energy and the force. There may be a combination of mathematics, mathematics and mathematics, and there may be a combination of mathematics and mathematics and mathematics and mathematics and mathematics and mathematics and mathematics and mathematics and mathematics and mathematics and mathematics and mathematics Beyond the probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics and the possibilities of measuring life-forms and matter-rates, the crucial non-standard interpretation of quantum mechanics is the The realistic interpretations that I quote either way, and how it's getting out and so on, and how to get into them and it's difficult to do that, and I would suggest that Einstein or Comde would also take on this kind of task of taking the semi-scientist way of describing the real world, but there's also a little bit of both ways. So, thank you. After this, we thank Frank Hartle with his diplomacy and quantum mechanics, and Sardar with his attempts at interpreting of the wave function, the pragmatic attitude of the physicists and of the experts in this seminar.

22:30 And I quote the Noto class in our cabinet, coming from Interloca 203. It is very hard to understand quantum mechanics, but after several years of physical practice, one gets used to preparing ways and taking part in them. This is the argument on which I am focused in my presentation today. And my crucial point here is that the percolation of quantum waves and the detection of particles are part of the applications of quantum theory, which is the principle of mathematics, and they are other metrics and keywords of the future, and this is rarely noted in the further work discussions on quantum theory. Why is there an asymmetry between preparing a quantum wave and reacting to a quantum particle? Because, to the ratio of a quantum state, you usually need to prepare a momentum state. And why that? Because momentum states are states. The position states of the energy column are called the momentum states. For a matter, and in many, in all texturing experiments of quantum physics, part of it is the information of the sphere, and in the vector of this light is the sphere, for example, coming from the laser, and also with the, and then it is coming from the light, with, well, as you find, properties, living energies of the, of those. On the other hand, now we have seen that the first stage is usually not always, but usually the momentum state is much more difficult to compare with the second stage, or a low-conductor state, or essentially a one-part state. On the other hand, the measurement of the quantum state is usually done four-five times in the same time. Defenses of position measurements, spin and spot are measured. Partial effects are measured. The partial effect is the defences of position measurements and then the partial effects are put together to get an event.

25:00 Diet is measured by the count of the atom, by the absorption of a photon, by the absorption of a photon as a measure of temperature, fluidity, liquid state, and fluidity of the atom. Obligation about the fluidity of the atom is 5.1. Why are standard states visually measured by particle detectors? Because measurements are the only way to do that. So, preparation and detection of other methods, quantum mechanics and also string and sphere theory, both theories and their explanation and validation and preparing of these is required for mathematics, but also the level of the dynamic learning. The other has experiments aimed at preparable data and with reproducible states, these are the momentum states, and they aim at detecting the properties of large and large mass tasks and tools within a very small space-time region. The waves propagate through the separators in any experiment or part of the field of planning. Finally, particles are detected. What remains from the part of the contract is something that I start out in a manual sense in my own part of the mathematics that I start out for financial. What remains then at the experimental level is an operational part of the contract. A particle is a collection of dynamic magnitudes such as mass, energy, speed, various kinds of targets including flavor and color targets, non-helical magnetic interactions, and these dynamic magnitudes are localized in an external operation of quantum mechanics. The conservation of waves through the apparatus on the other end. For example, the conservation of the waves along a parking space. This corresponds as a consideration to the conservation of the dynamic space along a parking space.

27:30 But there's all the correspondence of the operational context and context of the reform to clean up the definition of particles, the medical definition of particles, and some of the reasons for the representation of particles to identify the presence of particles. So, please just add the next thing between separation and hand-to-hand line, if that would be possible. Now the first part of the talk is almost time for this. I just want to mention what the problem is here. In quantum optics, there are many, there have been performed many experiments, including both on the atoms in the last decade. But there have been double experiments, additional devices, AIMS, localizing the particles in one class of the exponent. And here, for example, in the same double-slip experiment, a very common way to double-slip, but the interference pattern is obtained in terms of particle location, sometimes in a measurement of many, many others. Obviously, here, in a way that's positive, we are using one and the same experiment, and those experiments are different from each other. The double-slip is the sphere of the quantum wave, and the particle effect of the beam at the end detects the quantum wave as a wave, the sphere that is the sphere of the wave corresponds to the statistics of the quantum wave. There are also many experiments performed in mathematics, but they are the same kind of thing happening. There are thought experiments, how to measure the power of the particles, and later there are many possibilities. The only point I can emphasize here in this short talk is that this huge array of information is not really huge array of information. It's a broad line. It's a classical, if you will, a classical particle of a classical particle line.

30:00 What happens according to the plan in theory is that the weight function is applied to the computer, which then is put up with the computer and split up into two components and one has a different position. And what is done in the experiment of quantum optics is that the part is marked by a move of intelligence with some autos of about 3,000 states of the quantum universe. The common states are fortunate enough that they can feel the sensitivity of the linguists without all of the deep experiments, two-day experiments, and sentence arrays. They will be honest with the examples of the class preparation. And adding additional devices and changing the operations with information. I cannot go through these experiments. I have done many experiments in the late 90s. It was a comic theme expressed as standing light, lightweight, here as a very exponential device, the way particles can be generalized in a way that atoms, metal particles, interfere with themselves by being centered as a particle of reflection and a particle of theory, on the other hand, standing light, the way, here. I cannot go into the details of what is described in many of the chapters in chapter 7. Thank you for your attention. All of these are used by diagonal colonizers, so the colonization is safe after the right shift and the left shift is different, so the past information is obtained and used here and used here, but if the past information is erased from the colonizer, it makes the colonization faster.

32:30 The crucial point here is that Quantum waves are prepared and the preparation is changed by adding additional exponential devices and all the paradoxes or... All these things are only needed in a part of the picture. But once one has in mind the race picture and the change of the separation of the race, and that the race is a probabilistic prediction for the part of the particle detection of her in the end... There is no cause for paradox at all in this experiment with the marking of the past, the future, and the present in a way that is not the past. So, finally, I would like to end the last part of my talk with a few minutes left. On what there is, on the logic of the math, I'm not going to show you on there, but I want to explain the final results of the validation experiment that we will be doing in a minute. Metal waves propagate through a classical world, up into the human part of the planet, and that's the story told to the right effect on identity. The problem is that there is no sound, philosophical interpretation of these phantom waves, at least in the case of relativistic phantoms here, in which there are no Bohmians, which can be used in mathematics. On the other hand, these waves are prepared in order to do something.

35:00 And so acting realities by theory and analysis. The waves are prepared in order to generate interference patterns or to evade them and so on. And if you apply Higgins' reality criteria, if you can pray them or do some things like the electrons from the electron gun, then they are real. So Higgins' reality criteria doesn't apply to electrons in the form of particles. I don't need to do much thinking about them, but they apply to the quantum wave prepared by the electron wave. Wave party reality, according to this reality stream, is a feature of nature. Physicists also believe metaphysics and experiments make up mathematics in such a way that they trust it to have many levels of certain weight, such as in between oscillations, in the column, in the case of a violent defeat, or in the four-phase, in other words. Now, finally, I want to thank... The reality of the static wave is quite easy to understand in the static wave feature, but here we have a data with a single photon. There is only one photon in the assimilator at any time. Somehow one photon takes its time average from here. In particular, the tensions after the laser are so there that you may expect that only one photon will be there between the lasers in the time period of the duration of the experiment. Then you put in a vertical polynomial and you notice that the vertical polynomial lies. That is to say, that some substance, say, lies here. Then you put in a horizontal collaborator, obviously, nothing except. And the cross-collaborator prepares the latent state and what is observed, and it is that there is no light.

37:30 Next, you put in the diagonal collaborator, according to classical mathematics and also according to quantum theory. Each polarizer could have a state of lower amplitude with a different polarization, where the dot can be polarized, where the diagonal can be polarized, and where the horizontal can be polarized. What is observed in the experiment is fluctuating parts of the equation. So each polarizer has a standard state of lower altitude, but in the end, when the diagonal polarizer is in between the vertical and the horizontal, the preparation of the current state here is not the main field state, but one polarized state with some attitude that is different from zero. And so, you go to the part in the picture and ask what happens. A polarizer in a particle is termed an absorber. Partly an absorber. There are two particles of the right polarization and two particles of the wrong polarization that are absorbed. So, first is here absorber one, which is the advantage of it. Then you don't know whether the thing is going to escape from here, whether it will pass through or not, because there is no mechanism. Then you put in the second absorber and it is letting you know. Both absorbers together absorb. The vastness absorbs. The whole process, no doubt, absorbs. There are two absorbers, no party to party. Then you put in your third absorber, some proton parts. So, in the parking picture, you have an absorber, two absorbers, this and this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this, All of these are tolerizer experiments where as in the race picture you can see the subject of life in Asia, and some life gets through and down into the circulation of all these planets, and you have no problem with the race. In the case of this experiment with the picture, the explanation is as follows. The tolerizer prepares field models of uncarved observation number n.

40:00 Because the polarizer defines the phase shift of the components of the light, it defines the group there. Now it defines phase, phase, and phase and occupation are going to compute their complementary. The lecture always acts on a position of an answer of the patient's number and then therefore fluctuating counting for each of them. How should this be interpreted? According to realism, if you think that there are real particles, so if there are real particles from the experiment, then you have been absorbed by the experiment, as I mentioned before. On the other hand, if you think that we are right, we are not here, because the colonization phase does not contribute as much as the carbon size of the human body. The colonization phase is in the middle of the third climate change. Is there any, might there be any ignorance in the creation of quantum physics? I have no doubt. On the other hand, if you go to the intrametallistic picture, you remain with conditional probabilities only, for quantum and physical mathematics, the quantified exchange of conditional probabilities, the gamma and the two grains, and the causal relevance of the separation, of the causal state, at least roughly, of the regularity of quantality. But you might need the intrametallistic to find this. But then, to end up with a formula for deliberation, we now are left with the detection. And then you might implement the knowledge from which they experimented, I feel that it can be used as a storage of information in addition for making interference in the sphere.

42:30 The information must not be read out in the sphere and not made against an instrument. On the other hand, even if you don't talk about the storage or moving out of the information of math, you may ask yourself, on what will the Connemara act, according to the experimental literature, if they do not act on a real field space, a little bit, a curve? And could we just be agnostic about what's happening there? So you really also cannot be content with the instrumentalism which goes in the direction of the agnostic form that we have before. You have the constitutive principle of substance, which is a collection of quantum magnitudes, a collection of energy and spin. You have the regulative idea and content of something propagating, but it's only a regulative idea. And you conceive of the quantum wave as a real object in the sense of a symbolic intuitiveness of the state of our system. I cannot go into the details, but I think it is important to note that the American Instruction unifies the quantum powers and that it will experiment with them in the way it thinks it wants. I'm also not clear on the content of this conference, but I just wanted to make it clear. I just wanted to show you that this is a summarization experiment that has been written earlier, about the other metric between summarization and detection, and that it can be found away. However, there are other metrics which are not to external conditions on the one hand, but on the other hand they should be taken for real at the same time, otherwise there is a problem. But there is a type of hypothesis that you don't actually hear in the book, and if you want to know more about that, then you should only study it without explaining too much. Well, I have, I think, three interrelated questions about what I take to be your thesis

45:00 The first question is, when you gave an argument for why the particles that are detected, you said that the detectors are local. I'm not quite sure I see how that explains that particles are what is detected, because certainly in some sense of the word local. Preparation devices are also low, so I'm not quite sure whether I see how that counts as explanation. The second thing is about preparators. You said preparators prefer waves. I'm not sure if I remember correctly whether you said momentum eigenstates or monochromatic waves. Okay, well, then I wanted to ask you, surely there are laboratories who are well capable of repairing pulses with choppers and sometimes they can make pulses, not monochromatic waves, but wave packets which are included in femtoseconds or smaller... And they do experiments with that as well. So, I'm not sure whether I see that preparators are sort of necessarily consigned to preparing one of the matrices. And the third question I wanted to ask is that often it seems to me at least that A typical experiment will have some preparation design for things that get re-input and some defective at the end, and there are some devices in the middle, say the polarizations, the polarizers, and it seems to me that in many cases it's sort of a question of convenience, whether we would use our polarizers as part of the preparation.

47:30 Or we could, you know, place them just in front of the detector and so if there is indeed, if it's a question of convention, whether we are part of the apparatus or part of the preparation or detection side, then how would we have to deal with that when there are ontological consequences? Let me ask you a question. The K2 is a measurement. If you take it for convenience to add the polarizer to the measurement, I would say that the K2 is when it makes a click in the diver counter, or when the atom is generalized in the sphere droplet. In your other chamber or some chamber, there is actually a matter and whether the preparation is found in the mathematics or not also depends on whether the preparation is accompanied by a conclusion or not. It's up to you to decide. The measurement of the detection and the involvement of everything in the preparation of the data. The detection reduction of the wave function and the physical experiment. The reduction of the wave function and the position of the state. This is a bridge to the three-part question, but you know, the training, the preparation device, the classical directorate has also shown what is going to be, and I will note at the level that we have a subatomic process by one semester at home that is amplified in a matter of a couple of steps.

50:00 Some of which you might have some of which any of which you may not have. And the next question we talked about wave tankers. This is all about wave tankers. They prepare wave tankers. But what is the interpretation of these weight packets? The interpretation of these weight packets is exactly the same interpretation for them as it can be for those operations for them. There is a wonderful computer program, or a computer or something like that, they play around with these weight packets and look at their intuition and so on, but they look at their sense of weight, but they know that it's only a common distribution. So you have no sound interpretation of space. Another, a real sound example is that it's possible to take care of one photon, but this is quite recent, and then one photon escapes. In order to prepare them, you have to generate and obtain the photons here and count one photon when you know that the other one is going on. So this is also why there are propositional measurements on them. I think there is really a problem, and a problem is that there is only known literature about the relation between the relation on both. And that's the interesting point here. The problem is that what we really do, it's a lot of time, it's more interesting, and there's more time for the students, I guess, for the students and for the audience. I don't know why it's worse for the students than it is for the students. I wonder, would that be true? Would it be true? I'm just saying that you have this hacking criteria. Yeah. If you think that when memorials, when you go along with something say, all of these terms of fact show that whether you think that the election day is a wave or is a party, it is, I mean...

52:30 In some circumstances, it acts as if it is a wave, and in some circumstances it acts as if it is a particle, and that's it. I mean, that's almost, that's almost what we're looking at. Some circumstances are perturbation, and the other circumstances are . And there's a whole bunch of . But when you add that, then do they become more or more than others? Or no, no, no, no. Same data. Same data? But no, no, no. Very boring, isn't it? Yes, very boring. That's a generalization of a boring idea. Just to pick up on the last point I guess that was being asked is, well, if the criterion for what's real and what's not is that you can spray them and you're claiming that you can only spray the waves and not the particles, then why are you saying that the particles are just as real as the waves? If I can't spray the particles, then why should I believe that the particles are real? But I don't spray the detector with the detector. I mean, the detector doesn't spray them. My distinction is that there's only an operational part of that content there. The part of it is only retrieved before there was no part of it, before there was only the main part. Again, that's another matter. Right, but I mean, on the one hand, you can interpret this in that sort of philosophical vein,

55:00 but on the other hand, you want to appeal to practicing physicists, and you look at, say, someone like, I don't know, Afshar, and his reputation of complementarity, Duality that you can talk about as a wave of a particle in which the information is supposed to... The actual experiment is based on a theory of understanding. I agree. What is the wave measurement? I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. So we are quite a lot of us without trying to draw them back to some kind of classical reality. There's some kind of humanity that is not capitalized. And that's what we are not going to call them. We're still not going to call them, you know, we're not going to call them that way. But you know, we're going to treat them in terms of, you know, in terms of, you know, in terms of... I know that there are also relativistic accounts of a woman in a community. But the problem then is that in the interdisciplinary accounts or recombinations of the Bohmian approach, it's not possible for them. It's another way of expressing it. And they're very complicated, and there's always this abstract problem of the Bohmian approach. And so if they write down the mathematics, if they write down the special mathematics, if they write it down, it ends in the mind. 20 years later, they say now it's going to break down 10 to the minus 18 because now there are more X in the number 400K and so on. And now, a Boolean approach only manages to reconstruct some special importance of this sentence theory. The main ones are the computer names, like quantum mechanics itself, or quantum shear theory, and in order to grasp the principle of quantum shear theory, there is also a very good attempt at Arnold's criteria and his take-forward in composing the computer theory.

57:30 They are very complicated and I always have the obsession that they are not ruled out, obviously. But I don't believe in them. It's a great job managing it. I think we have two theories which have exactly the same duration and quantum mechanics as Bohmian mechanics. But with a little deeper mathematical integrations. Well, I'm not going to let you stick your name in the school, but I'm going to let you stick your name in the school. I've been ordered to take a moment of those and speak it over to you in a very specific domain. You need to make it attention when you say that there are things that are not planetary, that are planetary. That's a problem. So I would say there are a lot of quantum theories, with various dynamics, various dynamical equations, and so on, but I would say algebra is a truck truckload of computing observables. But there are many bohemian theories... If you don't have the right to pay for the course, it's hard. I understand that. I'm glad I was able to work with you on that.

1:00:00 Well, we don't program it. It shouldn't be done. But if I could make it, I would definitely do it. For example, the robot you call is using polarizers. It can't be caught between the two types of quantum mechanics. It's not using polarizers, which is quite important. What you see is thin, and thin may be the experimenter. What do you call the experimenter? The colorizer. Then you can extend the move. The colorizer experimenter, so to speak. It shows all the problems of quantum theory, all the implications of quantum physics.